The Mountain Times

°F Fri, May 24, 2013

Central Vermont's Most Popular Weekly Newspaper

Recommendations for economic development identifies current obstacles and potential solutions

An economic analysis of how the community of Killington raises and spends money on economic development and tourism has recommended a litany of changes to improve Killington's status as a destination resort.

The analysis, which was commissioned by the Killington Chamber of Commerce and conducted by Carl Ribaudo of the Strategic Marketing Group in Tahoe, California, was recently released and was intended to sharpen the focus of a discussion that has been ongoing for the past three years.

Specifically, the chamber charged Ribaudo with analyzing how Killington could best improve the way it funds and manages economic development, including town, chamber and EDT department.

Ribaudo met with 13 town and business leaders while conducting his study. While his suggestions focused on some of Killington's long-standing concerns - getting out from under the town debt at the golf course was one - he also provided an outside perspective on ways to reduce the duplication of economic development efforts within the community, and emphasized the need for Killington to improve its visual appearance and signage if it is to be an attractive destination resort.

The 21-page-report was divided into four main sections: Situation Analysis, Key Issues, Options for Consideration, and Additional Key Recommendations.

The first section, Situation Analysis, focuses on what is happening in and around Killington related to economic development and tourism. Ribaudo reported that a lot had changed since the EDT was originally created with a 1 percent local options tax dedicated to the department.

In a letter from Killington Chamber of Commerce President Chris Karr to the select board, Karr explains "since 2008, the EDT has transitioned from being a semi-autonomous entity with a dedicated and restricted funding source to being a town department funded by annual general fund appropriations."

That transition occurred after the $5 million golf course debt came to light, which forced the town to reconsider how it directed its economic development funding - reducing that amount to more quickly pay off the debt.

This section of the report also discusses how the national recession, increased competition from other resort communities and other factors have affected funding and tourism outside of Killington.

The second section, Key Issues, primarily analyzes funding sources. Notably, Ribaudo said that Killington currently funds tourism at a low level, stating that anything below $1 million annually is a small amount of funding for a destination marketing effort. This year Killington allocated $402,822 to the EDT.

Ribaudo also observed that the local options tax is an inefficient funding source as the town loses 30 percent in taxes to the state each year (as does every other town in the state that imposes a local options tax. It is state law.) He notes that because of the pressures on the town budget, which has held the line on property taxes while paying down the golf course debt, there has been a sizable decrease in the allocation of economic development dollars from town revenues.

Options for Consideration
Based on Killington's goals of improving the local tourism economy and resolving the golf course debt, Ribaudo provides a series of recommendations in the third section of the report,

OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION
The first option Ribaudo presents is to reduce the 30 percent that flows to the state. This option would require the town to seek legislative changes that would allow that 30 percent to be used locally. The argument is that money used locally on economic development projects will ultimately increase property taxes and, therefore, increase revenue to the state.

The second option presented was to repeal the 1 percent tax and replace it with a voluntary assessment. If the town could secure full participation from businesses, this option would also save the 30 percent that typically flows to the state.

A third option is to more aggressively pay down the golf course debt, which the town has already planned to do and many residents feel the current plan resolves the debt in a reasonable and responsible manner - a subject that has been thoroughly discussed in town for the past year.

A fourth option would be to sell the golf course and use the funds to accelerate the debt payments. And a fifth option is to do nothing and maintain the same course of action.

Few people, according to several local business leaders, are seriously considering options four or five.
In the final section of the report, Additional Key Recommendations, Ribaudo recommends important structural and procedural changes for the Chamber, EDT and overall town appearance. Those recommendations include:

• Evolving the role of the Chamber to focus on member advocacy, networking and benefit programs, so as not to duplicate efforts and create redundancy.

• Developing more consistent funding for the EDT and allow more flexibility with how it allocates that funding. This will allow for a longer-term economic development and tourism plan.

• Encouraging the town to improve the visual appearance of its commercial areas, specifically suggesting improvements to Killington's entrance and signage. The importance of an updated appearance is evident in a chart showing how other destination resorts in the state have seen growth since 2003 where Killington reports a loss.

Ribaudo cited a letter submitted by the Chamber observing "in order for the town and community to remain competitive as a destination and improve the quality of life for residents, Killington needs to foster major public/private investment."

In a recent select board meeting that reviewed the report, Karr noted that the report has already achieved part of its mission, which was to help kick-start a productive conversation in the town.

"We believe we can improve on the status quo and that we have unique and valuable perspective on the issues," Karr stated in the Chamber letter. "After three years of these initial efforts, we thought it would be wise to step back, look at the big picture, and consider how we can continue to improve… Our Town has made very strong progress in this area over the last three years, and we can do even more. We must do more."